This is the blog for ARH 365A, a course that explores how film defines ideas about visual artists. We will also examine the notion of film genre. While these movies can most obviously be called biopics, they also sometimes blur boundaries between established genres.
Friday, October 29, 2010
Post for Nov. 3
In our last three films (including the first half of "Camille Claudel,") we've seen artistic creation constructed in terms of gender. "Belly of an Architect" inverts (subverts?) traditional ideas of gender, "Artemisia" plays into them, and we haven't decided yet about "Camille Claudel" (although we did observe that Claudel's story is very much also Rodin's). What can the two latest readings contribute to your thinking about how gender is linked with art in these movies? Are women associated with nature and men with culture? (Ortner) Are compulsive looking and touching, and eroticism identified with female art-making? (Felleman) Due by the end of the day Tuesday, Nov. 2.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment